I noted that concentric Vs rectilinear made a difference, that may be what we are seeing.jsc wrote:Zip up your factory file and attach it so I can see what you're doing differently.
Poor horizontal-supported surfaces.
-
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 7:31 pm
Re: Poor horizontal-supported surfaces.
- Attachments
-
- raptor_reloaded_gauntlet.zip
- Factory file
- (208.13 KiB) Downloaded 425 times
Re: Poor horizontal-supported surfaces.
Yes, that is the difference. You have concentric top infill. I would use rectilinear with this model.
Also, your support density is 10% except for the top 3 layers. I don't know if 3 layers is enough to recover from that low a density. If you look at the gcode preview, you will see that it's trying valiantly to place the dense layers over basically nothing. Bring that up to 20%, even 30%, or use more dense layers.
Also, your support density is 10% except for the top 3 layers. I don't know if 3 layers is enough to recover from that low a density. If you look at the gcode preview, you will see that it's trying valiantly to place the dense layers over basically nothing. Bring that up to 20%, even 30%, or use more dense layers.